Close

Share: Lesson # 532 (part 1) Current Status of the Jurisdiction of Non-Ordained Judges

Fill out the fields below to share this with your friends.

Your Name*:
Your Email*:
Your Friend's Email*:Enter multiple email addresses separated by a comma
Short Message:	I thought you might like to read this article on the Israel Center website: ---------------------------------------------- Lesson # 532 (part 1) Current Status of the Jurisdiction of Non-Ordained Judges That is, in addition to being the type of case which occurs frequently, it must also involve a loss of money. It would seem, however, that the reason why in Tractate Gittin the sole test discussed is that of frequency, and no mention is made of money loss, is that Talmudic case is a non-monetary case. The issue raised in it is limited to the question of jurisdiction over a coerced divorce. In a similar manner in a situation of overriding importance, http://www.ouisrael.org/tidbits/detail/1436/
Send a Copy to Me:

* Required fields.