Torah Tidbits
Parsha Points to Ponder
Parsha Points to Ponder for Parsha MISHPATIM
1) Why does the Torah say the double language of MOT YUMAT when relating that certain sinners should be killed by the Jewish court (example - 21:12)?
2) Why does the Torah interrupt the laws regarding hitting and killing parents with the seemingly unrelated law about a kidnapper (21:16)?
3) Why does the Torah describe afflicting a widow and orphan in the singular (OTO) and not the plural (OTAM) since it is describing both of them (22:22)?
Answers - Ponder the questions first and then look here
1) The Ohr HaChayim explains that a person who receives capital punishment was already liable to be killed by G-D for his sin. G-D gives the Jewish court jurisdiction to be the ones to kill this person who already deserves to be killed from heaven. Thus, MOT refers to the person’s automatic judgment for death from heaven and the Torah is telling us that that person YUMAT, should be killed by the court.
2) Da’at Zekainim MiBaalei Hatosfot answer that both one who hits a parent and one who kidnaps receive death by strangulation, while cursing a parent receives death by stoning. Therefore, the first two are grouped together in the Torah.
3) The Kli Yakar teaches that when a person afflicts a widow, he is likely also hurting the orphan who sees it happening or receives the emotional results of this hurt. The same applies to afflicting an orphan where the widow is usually impacted. The Torah captures this idea by describing the law of hurting both of them in the singular - the action to one hurts both. This also explains the use of double language throughout this section (ANEI T’ANEH, TZA’OK YITZAK).
Points to Ponder is prepared by Rabbi Dov Lipman who teaches at Reishit Yerushalayim and Machon Maayan in Beit shemesh and is the author of “DISCOVER: Answers for Teenagers (and Adults) to Questions about the Jewish Faith” (Feldheim) and “TIMEOUT: Sports Stories as a Game Plan for Spiritual Success” (Devora) His Hagada commentary, “FOUNDATIONS” will be published by Targum before Pesach
(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)
Your Comments
OU Israel and Torah Tidbits do not endorse the political or halachic positions of its editor, columnists, or advertisers, nor guarantee the quality of advertised services of products. Nor do we endorse the kashrut of hotels, restaurants, caterers or food products that are advertised in TT (except, of course, those under OU-Israel hashgacha). We recommend that readers check with the advertisers themselves to clarify kashrut and shmita details of their services and products.
In This Issue of Torah Tidbits
- Lead Tidbit
- Candle A Day
- Jewish Law
- Wisdom & Wit
- Aliya-by-Aliya Sedra Summary
- Sedra Stats
- Vebbe Rebbe
- Portion of the Portion
- MicroUlpan
- Parsha Points to Ponder
- TTriddles "Report"
- Person In The Parsha
- Word of the Month
- Praying With Passion
- Ethical Teachings of the Torah
- Chizuk and Idud
- Towards Better Davening and Torah Reading
- Divrei Menachem
- "From Machon Puah"
Recent Torah Tidbits
- Issue 922 - Shabbat Parshat Nitzavim - Vayeilech; Rosh Hashana; Haazinu - Shabbat Shuva from 5770-5771
- Issue 921 - Parshat Ki Tavo 5770
- Issue 920 - Parshat Ki Teitzei 5770
- Issue 919 - Parshat Sho-f'tim 5770
- Issue 918 - Parshat Re'i 5770
- Issue 917 - Parshat Eikev 5770
- Issue 0894 - Issue 894 - Parshat B’shalach - Shabbat Shira - Tu BiShvat 5770
- Issue 883 - Parshat Chayei Sara 5770
- Issue 0822 - Issue 882 - Parshat Vayeira 5770
- Issue 0881 - Issue 881 - Parshat Lech L'cha 5770
- Issue 0880 - Issue 880 - Parshat No'ach 5770
- Issue 0879 - Issue 879 - Parashat B'reishit 5770
- View All Issue Archives
Have a Question or Comment?
Please fill in the required information below. Your comment will be reviewed by a moderator prior to posting. If you have a question or concern about this article please contact the Editor.