Torah Tidbits

6 September 2010 / 27 Elul 5770
Issue 0856
Tazria Metzora 5769
April 24, 2009

Vebbe Rebbe

Vebbe Rebbe - Bottle of Scotch Left in Hong Kong

Q: I spent some time in Hong Kong in the fall of 2007 and since I was planning to return the following summer, I left some things there, including a bottle of scotch, which I did not give thought to until I returned in May 2008. Is it chametz she’avar alav haPesach (=ChP; chametz owned by a Jew over Pesach)? While I did not include it in my mechirat (sale of) chametz, did my bitul (nullification of) chametz help?

A: We accept Rabbi Shimon’s opinion (Pesachim 30a) that ChP is a rabbinic injunction that forbids one to eat or benefit from chametz that was owned by a Jew because one (could have) violated bal yeira’eh bal yimatzei (=BYBY; the prohibition to possess chametz on Pesach). When BYBY does not apply, neither does ChP (ibid.). One would then think that if he did bitul chametz, which removes the Torah prohibition of BYBY, the ChP should not apply. The Yerushalmi (see the Rosh, Pesachim 2:4) brings a machloket on the matter. We accept R. Yochanan’s opinion, who forbids it due to concern that one will abuse the system (Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 448:5). The Rambam (Chametz U’Matza 1:4) and Shulchan Aruch (ibid.:3) say that ChP is forbidden even when one left the chametz b’shogeg (accidentally) or b’oness (due to extenuating circumstances). The Bi’ur Halacha (to 448:3) seriously considers the claim of some that when combining the grounds for leniency (i.e. bitul and the fact that one did not purposely violate BYBY) then ChP would not apply. However, he focuses primarily on a case of oness, whereas your case of shogeg is likely more stringent.

There is, however, an important point of leniency in your case. Since you left Hong Kong more than 30 days before Pesach and did not have intention to return until after Pesach, you were not required to do bedikat (search for) chametz before leaving (Pesachim 6a; Shulchan Aruch, OC 436:1). There is a major machloket whether this exemption is only from bedika or whether one is even exempt from removing known chametz (see Mishna Berura 436:5).

According to the lenient opinion (including the Ritva, Pesachim 6 and Pri Chadash 436), you did nothing wrong, as such a person may rely on bitul wherever he will be (although we would recommend mechira). If so, there certainly would not be a problem of ChP.

What should be according to the opinion that you should have taken care of the chametz you knew about? When you were removing the chametz from your regular house, whether by formal bedika or other preparations (including mechirat chametz) you should have sold the chametz in Hong Kong or got someone to get rid of it. Your failure to remember the Hong Kong chametz is not fundamentally different from doing bedika but forgetting to look under the couch. Regarding a case that one did an imperfect bedika and a bitul, the Mishna Berura (448:25) brings strong indications in either direction whether ChP applies. He concludes that in a case of significant loss, one can sell the chametz to a non-Jew, which is usually forbidden for ChP, but is permitted according to some opinions when one did bitul.

Depending on where you live (Western US?) and when you did bitul on the night of bedika, there could be a complication because Hong Kong is 13 hours ahead of US’s Eastern Time. Bitul can only be done until an hour before chatzot (halachic midday) (Shulchan Aruch, OC 434:2). Although most poskim say that in such matters, we follow the owner’s place, not the chametz’s, the Igrot Moshe (OC, IV 94) says that if the chametz is in a place where the timing does not work out, it becomes forbidden (see Mechirat Chametz K’hilchato 3:17 and Living the Halachic Process, D-17). However, given the other indications for leniency (including at least one we did not mention), we still say that if the loss of an (expensive?) bottle of scotch is significant to you, you can sell it to a non-Jew.

The Orthodox Union - via its website - fields questions of all types in areas of kashrut, Jewish law and values. Some of them are answered by Eretz Hemdah, the Institute for Advanced Jewish Studies, Jerusalem, headed by Rav Yosef Carmel and Rav Moshe Ehrenreich, founded by HaRav Shaul Yisraeli zt"l, to prepare rabbanim and dayanim to serve the National Religious community in Israel and abroad. Ask the Rabbi is a joint venture of the OU, Yerushalayim Network, Eretz Hemdah… and the Israel Center. The above is a Q&A from Eretz Hemdah.

Your Comments

Post a Comment

Have a Question or Comment?

Please fill in the required information below. Your comment will be reviewed by a moderator prior to posting. If you have a question or concern about this article please contact the Editor.

Remember my personal information
Notify me of follow-up comments?

Spam Protection
Help us fight spam by entering the word you see in the image

OU Israel and Torah Tidbits do not endorse the political or halachic positions of its editor, columnists, or advertisers, nor guarantee the quality of advertised services of products. Nor do we endorse the kashrut of hotels, restaurants, caterers or food products that are advertised in TT (except, of course, those under OU-Israel hashgacha). We recommend that readers check with the advertisers themselves to clarify kashrut and shmita details of their services and products.

In This Issue of Torah Tidbits

Candle Lighting and Havdala

Candle Lighting Sponsored By: